On being "brought up by a single mum"

On being "brought up by a single mum"

I heard the phrase again the other day — "she was brought up by a single mum" — and felt that familiar flicker of irritation. It took me a moment to work out why.

Sit with the phrase for a second and you’ll see it's implying  she grew up without a father.

That's patriarchy doing what it does best — not shouting, just quietly setting the default. It positions a man's presence at the centre of every family and assumes his contribution is greater than the mother’s.

Nobody says "brought up by a two-parent household" and means it as a compliment. It's just a description. But "brought up by a single mum" carries a verdict, however politely it's dressed up. That's the tell. We don't notice the language of prejudice when it's aimed at the majority pattern — only when it deviates from it.

Kids raised by single mums aren't running an upbringing at a handicap. They're being raised by someone who is entirely, completely there. One steady adult, fully present, is not a fraction of a family. It's a family.

I think about this a lot in the books I write. I want children to see the shape of their home reflected back at them — one parent, two parents, two mums, two dads, grandparents, blended, whatever it is — without a footnote explaining what's missing. Representation isn't just about including different kinds of families. It's about including them without apology.

Previous
Previous

Learning to Slow Down, Again

Next
Next

Why We Tell Stories